Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Editor's Pick

U.S. downplays talk of Iraq withdrawal, says troops will stay in Syria

U.S. officials on Friday said they have agreed to a two-stage shift in the American military presence in Iraq that will allow for continued operations against Islamic State militants in Syria, but pointedly disputed Baghdad’s earlier assertions that a near-total withdrawal is underway.

The announcement, coming two weeks after the Iraqi government said it had reached a deal with the Biden administration to remove most U.S. troops over the next two years, underscored Washington’s hesitancy to telegraph its military movements at a time of extreme volatility in the Middle East. But it also sowed confusion over the eventual end state of the Pentagon presence in the country.

There are 2,500 American personnel in Iraq now. Iraqi officials have said that once the drawdown is complete, a small residual force would remain in northern Iraq to act as a bulwark against the Iranian-backed militia groups that hold wide sway in the rest of the country. Speaking to reporters Friday, officials from the State Department and Defense Department declined to confirm those plans, alluding instead to the U.S. government’s desire for a “sustainable security partnership” with the Iraqis.

“I’d like to emphasize that this is an evolution of the military mission in Iraq,” a senior Biden administration official said, speaking on the condition of anonymity under ground rules set by the State Department. “We’re moving towards the type of productive, long-term security relationship the United States has with partners around the world.”

The official told reporters there “could very well be” changes in the number of U.S. troops in Iraq but declined to elaborate. U.S. and Iraqi discussions are ongoing, the official said.

A Pentagon spokeswoman, Sabrina Singh, said during a separate briefing Friday “it’s fair to say” that “our footprint is going to be changing within the country.” She, too, declined to provide additional details.

U.S. officials did affirm that the first phase of this “evolution” will end the current military mission in Iraq by September 2025. Baghdad and Washington also have “reached an understanding” in which the roughly 900 U.S. forces deployed to neighboring Syria will continue to receive support from the Iraqi side of the border through at least September 2026, the senior administration official said.

The Iraqi government did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the U.S. government’s characterization of the agreement.

The announcement’s ambiguity suggests Washington hopes to preserve some wiggle room in its talks with Baghdad. It also highlights how painstakingly sensitive the negotiations have been, for both sides. The American presence in Iraq is deeply unpopular, and the government of Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani has been eager to demonstrate he can end or at least curtail it.

Since the eruption of renewed conflict between Israel and Hamas militants in the Gaza Strip a year ago, U.S. positions in Iraq, Syria and Jordan have come under extensive attacks by Iranian-backed militias. Three U.S. troops were killed by a one-way attack drone in January at a U.S. base in Jordan supporting operations in Syria. American forces have conducted periodic airstrikes in response, most recently in July near Baghdad, drawing intense blowback from the Iraqi public.

American troops also continue to conduct periodic operations against remaining Islamic State militants. Last month, seven U.S. troops were wounded doing so in western Iraq.

The counter-ISIS mission, now a decade old, remains a priority, officials say. The Obama administration, which had removed all U.S. troops from Iraq in 2011, launched a comprehensive air war against the militants over the next few years and deployed thousands of U.S. forces on the ground to assist Iraqi forces as they took back territory.

Kurdish forces in neighboring Syria maintain the detention centers housing thousands of captured militants and occasionally targeted by the group’s remnants. The Syrian government has tolerated the U.S. presence in the east, but the two nations do not have official relations.

Both countries continue to face threats from the Islamic State, a reality highlighted by the joint raid in August that killed at least 14 militants. U.S. military officials said then that the ISIS fighters were heavily armed and seemingly prepared for a fight.

A senior defense official, speaking on the call with reporters Friday, said the United States retains its right to self-defense and has demonstrated that “we will not hesitate to take all appropriate action to protect our personnel.” Those principles will continue to apply, the official said, as this shift in mission occurs.

Missy Ryan contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on washingtonpost.com






    You May Also Like

    Editor's Pick

    Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio) and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz (D) will face off Tuesday night at a CBS News vice-presidential debate in New York....

    Latest News

    A North Korean defector who escaped to the South more than a decade ago was detained after attempting to cross back into North Korea...

    Economy

    A U.N. human rights group confirmed Hamas’ leader in Lebanon, who was recently killed by Israeli strikes, was their employee.  Fateh Sherif was killed...

    Investing

    Astron (ASX:ATR) and Energy Fuels (TSX:EFR,NYSEAMERICAN:UUUU) have completed the establishment of a joint venture to advance the Australia-based Donald rare earths and mineral sands...

    Disclaimer: balanceandcharge.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.


    Copyright © 2024 balanceandcharge.com