Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?


Lawmakers demand answers from AP, Reuters amid accusations their journalists knew about Hamas attack

FIRST ON FOX: Rep. Mike Lawler, R-N.Y., is asking The Associated Press and Reuters to answer questions about their journalists’ knowledge of the Oct. 7 Hamas attack after Israel accused the outlets of having a forewarning of the terrorist strike that killed over 1,200 people. 

Lawler, along with a bipartisan group of lawmakers, is penning letters to the news outlets demanding answers about any possible knowledge they may have had prior to the Hamas attack, which the outlets previously denied.

‘That these journalists would knowingly not share this information, and in the process save thousands of Israeli and Gazan lives, is simply beyond the pale,’ said Lawler. 

After a report from Honest Reporting raised ethical questions about why some AP and Reuters journalists were at the site of attack shortly after the atrocities occurred, the Israeli government’s press office director, Nitzan Chen, accused the outlets of being ‘alongside Hamas terrorists, documenting the murder of Israeli civilians, lynching of soldier and kidnappings to Gaza,’ according to a letter obtained by Politico. 

Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Michael McCaul said that if the allegations are true, and the journalists ‘had prior knowledge of this deadly attack, yet said nothing,’ it is ‘morally repugnant’ and needs to be ‘thoroughly investigated.’

‘It’s not enough to just verify the authenticity of images — these outlets have a moral obligation to ensure they aren’t being used as pawns to spread Hamas propaganda,’ said McCaul. 

However, The Associated Press and Reuters are denying any involvement.

The Associated Press said ‘the first pictures AP received from any freelancer show they were taken more than an hour after the attacks began. No AP staff were at the border at the time of the attacks, nor did any AP staffer cross the border at any time.’ 

Reuters also asserted that their staffers were ‘not on the ground at the locations referred to in the Honest Reporting article.’

‘Reuters categorically denies that it had prior knowledge of the attack or that we embedded journalists with Hamas on Oct. 7,’ the outlet said.

Nonetheless, Lawler wants the news organizations to ‘come clean’ so that the lawmakers can ‘get to the bottom’ of the events that occurred in the early hours prior to the terrorist attack. 

‘These companies must come clean about any involvement or advance notice their contractors or employees may have had of the October 7th massacres,’ said Lawler. ‘It should not be hard for both news outlets to provide answers, and we must get to the bottom of this. We demand the truth.’

McCaul added that the outlets should ‘ensure their reporting is independent and impartial.’

The AP pointed to its previous response to the allegations when reached Wednesday by Fox News.

Fox News has reached out to Reuters for comment.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Enter Your Information Below To Receive Free Trading Ideas, Latest News And Articles.

    Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!

    You May Also Like

    Latest News

    North Korea may be known as the hermit kingdom, but the isolated nation could be edging toward opening its borders to small numbers of...

    Editor's Pick

    One of the perks of being speaker of the House — or at least, one of the characteristics of it — is that you...

    Latest News

    Evacuations are underway across Hawaii’s Big Island and Maui as passing Hurricane Dora helps fuel wildfires that have damaged structures, prompted rescues and spurred...

    Latest News

    Former world No. 1 Caroline Wozniacki won her first competitive tennis match in three-and-a-half years on Tuesday, defeating Australian Kimberly Birrell 6-2 6-2 at...

    Disclaimer:, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2024