Stock

Fox Corp must face Smartmatic $2.7 billion defamation claim

By Jonathan Stempel

NEW YORK (Reuters) -Fox Corp, the parent of Fox News Network, failed to convince a New York state appeals court to dismiss a defamation claim in electronic voting systems company Smartmatic’s $2.7 billion lawsuit over the network’s 2020 post-election coverage.

A five-judge panel of the Appellate Division in Manhattan ruled on Thursday that Smartmatic sufficiently alleged the Fox parent was directly liable for on-air statements suggesting Smartmatic helped rig the 2020 U.S. presidential election to favor Democrat Joe Biden over Republican Donald Trump.

Claims that the parent directed on-air talent to undertake a disinformation campaign, and played an active role in coverage, “sufficiently allege Fox Corporation’s ‘direct liability’ for the challenged defamatory statements,” the court said.

The appeals court also said Smartmatic’s failure to allege that the Fox parent “wholly dominated” Fox News Network meant the parent could not be liable for defamation on that basis.

“We will be ready to defend this case surrounding extremely newsworthy events when it goes to trial,” Fox Corp (NASDAQ:FOXA) said in a statement. “Smartmatic’s damages claims are implausible, disconnected from reality, and on their face intended to chill First Amendment freedoms.”

J. Erik Connolly, a lawyer for Smartmatic, in a statement said the parent company “must now answer for its actions at trial.”

Smartmatic claimed that Fox broadcast lies about its technology to boost ratings, and keep Trump supporters from defecting to right-wing networks Newsmax and One America News.

The company has said it provided technology for the 2020 election only to Los Angeles County, which Biden won. Smartmatic has offices in London and in Boca Raton, Florida.

Other defendants include host Maria Bartiromo and the estate of late host Lou Dobbs.

In April 2023, Fox reached a $787.5 million settlement in a similar defamation lawsuit by voting technology company Dominion Voting Systems, as a trial in Delaware was about to begin.

The case is Smartmatic USA Corp et al v Fox Corp et al, New York State Supreme Court, Appellate Division, 1st Department, No. 2024-01388.

This post appeared first on investing.com

You May Also Like

Economy

A U.N. human rights group confirmed Hamas’ leader in Lebanon, who was recently killed by Israeli strikes, was their employee.  Fateh Sherif was killed...

Investing

Astron (ASX:ATR) and Energy Fuels (TSX:EFR,NYSEAMERICAN:UUUU) have completed the establishment of a joint venture to advance the Australia-based Donald rare earths and mineral sands...

Editor's Pick

Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio) and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz (D) will face off Tuesday night at a CBS News vice-presidential debate in New York....

Latest News

A North Korean defector who escaped to the South more than a decade ago was detained after attempting to cross back into North Korea...

Disclaimer: balanceandcharge.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

Copyright © 2025 balanceandcharge.com

Exit mobile version