Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Economy

Bank of Canada says changes to mortgage structure will not resolve housing affordability

By Promit Mukherjee

OTTAWA, Nov 6

Canada’s housing affordability cannot be resolved by changing the country’s unique mortgage structure, the Bank of Canada’s Senior Deputy Governor said on Wednesday, as a wave of mortgage renewals over the next two years threaten to hurt the economy.

“Improved housing affordability requires a better balance between supply and demand, and achieving this balance will take time,” Carolyn Rogers (NYSE:ROG) said in Toronto in an address on the country’s mortgage market.

The country’s mortgage structure has largely helped in maintaining financial stability and access to affordable credit, keeping its mortgage default at amongst the lowest in advanced economies, she said.

Canadian mortgages are either variable rate or fixed rate which is adjustable after every four or five years, making home owners vulnerable to changes in interest rate. By contrast, the structure in the U.S. is usually 30-year fixed rate.

Rogers said more than four million or about 60% of all outstanding mortgages would be renewed over the next two years and a bulk of those would face a significant increase in their payment, despite interest rate cuts.

The BoC has reduced its key interest rate four times in a row to 3.75% to spur growth after inflation returned to its 1%-3% control range.

But economists have said that despite the cuts, mortgage renewals will be at a much higher rate as the most prevalent five-year mortgages are linked to long-term bond yields which have not gone down much.

“Higher payments (on mortgages) could cause households to pull back on spending by more than we expect,” she said.

“Widespread losses in the mortgage market could also have implications for market liquidity and overall financial stability,” she added.

But changing the mortgage structure from a shorter length, such as, four- or five-year to a 10-year, will require policy changes, but in many ways the current structure has helped in discouraging too much leverage.

“We need to resist the temptation to try to solve the housing affordability challenge by tinkering too much with the mortgage market,” Rogers said.

Reporting by Promit Mukherjee; Editing by Dale Smith

(promit.mukherjee@tr.com)

This post appeared first on investing.com






    You May Also Like

    Editor's Pick

    Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio) and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz (D) will face off Tuesday night at a CBS News vice-presidential debate in New York....

    Latest News

    A North Korean defector who escaped to the South more than a decade ago was detained after attempting to cross back into North Korea...

    Economy

    A U.N. human rights group confirmed Hamas’ leader in Lebanon, who was recently killed by Israeli strikes, was their employee.  Fateh Sherif was killed...

    Investing

    Astron (ASX:ATR) and Energy Fuels (TSX:EFR,NYSEAMERICAN:UUUU) have completed the establishment of a joint venture to advance the Australia-based Donald rare earths and mineral sands...

    Disclaimer: balanceandcharge.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.


    Copyright © 2024 balanceandcharge.com